Re: Correct babel format for ditaa?

["Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com>]

Hi John,

Yes, (1) below is the preferred format, however the "ditaa" language is
not enabled by default.  Please customize the org-babel-load-languages
variable to enable support for evaluating ditaa code blocks, and then
try the code block syntax mentioned in (1) below again and a ditaa
figure should be successfully exported.

A benefit of the (1) (aka Babel) method below is that code blocks can be
evaluated "live" from inside the Org-mode buffer with C-c C-c.  See
Chapter 14 of the manual or the relevant portion of the quick guide
http://orgmode.org/guide/Working-With-Source-Code.html for more
information on using Babel.

Best -- Eric

John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
>
> I have been having a difficult time with an export (which includes a ditaa
> graphic) to PDF via LaTeX recently and am puzzled by it. Which is the
> correct format?
>
> 1) Supported by:
> - http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html#playingwithditaa
> - http://orgmode.org/Changes.html#ob-configuration-changes (indirectly seems
> to indicate this format?)
>
> #+begin_src ditaa :file file.png :cmdline -r -S -s 2.5
> ---
> Picture here
> ---
> #+end_src
>
>
> 2) Supported by:
> - http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-exp-blocks.php
> -
> http://emacs-fu.blogspot.com/2009/10/writing-presentations-with-org-mode-and.html
>
> #+begin_ditaa file.png -r -S -s 2.5
> ---
> Picture here
> ---
> #+end_ditaa
>
> Only #2 is working for me currently, though I suspect that #1 is the 'truer'
> form? Not sure what's going on...
>
>
> Thanks,
> John
>
> P.S. Is there a way to enlarge the output? Using the -s option only seems to
> make the resolution higher, not change the actual size (inches, pixels,
> whatever) in the LaTeX output...
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode