From: Nicolas <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
To: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Arver <linusarver@gmail.com>,
emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>
Subject: Re: indentation for section headings vs bulleted lists
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:27:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878vxazvi6.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C066F2AA-7750-482F-8825-46B37BAACA81@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:39:20 +0100")
Hello,
Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:
> while it might be posible to add additional line-prefix stuff to plain
> lists, you need to be careful about performance.
Yes, this is my main concern actually. When I speak about a "decent"
solution, I'm really thinking about a "sufficiently reactive" one,
provided such a thing exists.
As far as I can tell, line-prefix is fine as it is. Lists just need to
take it as real indentation before processing. Alas, wrap-prefix is the
real problem.
A solution would be to distinguish if org-indent-refresh-section is
called with point in a list or not. In the former case, it would skip
lists when changing warp-prefix in the section. In the latter situation,
it would only set warp-prefix for the list at point.
But then, hooks like org-after-demote-entry-hook would need to call
org-indent-refresh-section with an argument telling it to redefine
warp-prefix for everything in section, lists included. After all, a
small delay is acceptable for interactive use.
Does it sound "decent"?
Regards,
--
Nicolas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-20 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-18 6:39 indentation for section headings vs bulleted lists Linus Arver
2011-02-18 8:52 ` Bastien
2011-02-19 2:34 ` Linus Arver
2011-02-19 9:35 ` Bastien
2011-02-20 7:22 ` Linus Arver
2011-02-20 12:19 ` Nicolas
2011-02-20 12:39 ` Carsten Dominik
2011-02-20 13:27 ` Nicolas [this message]
2011-02-20 19:51 ` Linus Arver
2011-02-20 23:26 ` [PATCH] " Nicolas
2011-02-21 1:04 ` Linus Arver
2011-02-21 10:59 ` Giovanni Ridolfi
2011-02-21 17:32 ` Nicolas
2011-02-18 18:18 ` Darlan Cavalcante Moreira
2011-02-19 2:46 ` Linus Arver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878vxazvi6.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=n.goaziou@gmail.com \
--cc=bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr \
--cc=carsten.dominik@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=linusarver@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).