From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Code vanishes on export
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:45:40 -0600
Message-ID: <878vqi7fvf.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <20110824101326.GA13980@panahar> <87liui7vxu.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAMXnza1tNBAH2JBOwUHoznAembP2gVnTednqmHfUx=A9vF1-+g@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wre2ogo6.fsf@tajo.ucsd.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:57642)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1QwJOn-0005S5-OA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:46:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1QwJOa-0004Q1-9z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:45:59 -0400
Received: from mail-yi0-f41.google.com ([209.85.218.41]:58299)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1QwJOZ-0004NO-Q2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:45:52 -0400
Received: by yib2 with SMTP id 2so1225568yib.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87wre2ogo6.fsf@tajo.ucsd.edu> (cberry@tajo.ucsd.edu's message of
	"Wed, 24 Aug 2011 10:36:25 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: </archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: cberry@tajo.ucsd.edu
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Can you supply a minimal example file with instructions to reproduce
this behavior?

Thanks -- Eric

cberry@tajo.ucsd.edu writes:

> suvayu ali <fatkasuvayu+linux@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Vikas Rawal <vikaslists@agrarianresearch.org> writes:
>>>
>>>> I obviously do not want the code to be removed from my org file.
>>>>
>>>
>>> There are ways of controlling whether code or results or both or neither
>>> are included in code export.
>>>
>>
>> As far as I understand from Vikas' last remark, his org file is getting
>> changed.
>
> FWIW, I experienced this myself. "#+begin_src R" blocks vanished from
> the *.org file during export (but I was saved by version control!).
>
> I think this behavior showed up after 7.7, but I cannot reproduce it now
> (I did a git pull at release_7.7.170.gcaaad.dirty and have since modified
> the *.org file on which it happened).
>
> IIRC, it did not happen for exports when :export never was set for the
> buffer and not circumvented by  '#+begin_src R :eval t'. 
>
> Maybe this has (coincidentally) been corrected by the recent update of
> ob-exp.el, ob.el, and org-exp-blocks.el?
>  
> Chuck

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/