From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: Rendering error, or am I missing something?   -- case 3.
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 12:54:43 -0700
Message-ID: <878vjkqe0a.fsf@gmx.com>
References: <jio2f2$sg4$1@dough.gmane.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38397)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1S3CKf-0008Nj-Sp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:10:35 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1S3CKb-0003nA-1Y
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:10:33 -0500
Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:60286
	helo=mailout-us.mail.com) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1S3CKa-0003ml-Qh
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 15:10:28 -0500
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Allen S. Rout" <asr@ufl.edu>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

I've just pushed up a fix for this issue, please let me know if it
doesn't work on your system.

"Allen S. Rout" <asr@ufl.edu> writes:

> So, this is a different problem (I presume) which I'm exercising in
> the same document I'm trying to write.
>
> With latest git org-mode, and minimal3.org, I get minimal3.pdf:
>
> If there are successive inline calls to a function in the same line of
> text, then the last of them is rendered "correctly" (though successive
> calls in the same paragraph still evince the 'last two characters of
> call' bug.    Earlier calls in the line are rendered 'verbatim', or
> how I'd expect the string to be rendered if I didn't know it was
> supposed to call a block.
>
>
> - Allen S. Rout
>
>

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/