From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
To: Kalev Takkis <kalev.takkis@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: org-capture target files
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2012 12:11:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878vc1rqul.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMeOJK6TiUpsO99Biyn7Ty1LrVk_Lhtt7qmdQT-MezFuop2tNw@mail.gmail.com> (Kalev Takkis's message of "Sun, 16 Sep 2012 00:25:59 +0300")
Hi Kalev,
Kalev Takkis <kalev.takkis@gmail.com> writes:
> Is it possible to take a note in org-capture and to specify one or
> several files to put the message into only after the note is written?
You can refile a note from the capture buffer with C-c C-w.
I added a command to /copy/ the note instead of refiling it: C-c M-w.
Finding the copying location works the same way than for refile. So
now you can copy the item from the capture buffer to several files.
> The workflow I have in mind is first pressing C-c c to take a note;
> selecting the type of note I'd like to take; typing the message,
> pasting a link etc., finishing the note, with C-c C-c and then ending
> up in a list of available *.org files (which could already be on
> display in a window next to capture window) from which I can select
> the file(s) where to send the note to.
The available process is a bit different: capture, edit, refile or copy,
then finalize the capture process.
> After some ferocious googling
> for the past two months it seems that this kind of system does not
> exist (right?).
Two months of googling! Phew. :)
> But would it be possible to write something like that? After
> consulting with the org-capture.el file I have some doubts, all
> capture templates expect the destination file to be known beforehand,
Yes -- hence the different process describe above.
> and the filename is resolved early in the capture process. There is
> a template where a function is supposed to find the target and which
> is described as the most flexible way, but since the capture already
> happens in the target file in an indirect buffer, I don't think it's
> flexibility is enough.
>
> What do you think, is there a way to do this?
Please try the new feature if you can (it is in the git master branch)
and let me know if it helps.
Best,
--
Bastien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-09-23 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-09-15 21:25 org-capture target files Kalev Takkis
2012-09-15 21:56 ` Charles Philip Chan
2012-09-16 14:30 ` darcamo
2012-09-23 10:11 ` Bastien [this message]
2012-09-23 16:59 ` Kalev Takkis
2012-09-24 5:08 ` Bastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=878vc1rqul.fsf@bzg.ath.cx \
--to=bzg@altern.org \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=kalev.takkis@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).