From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Justus-bulk@Piater.name
Subject: Re: Patch: org-agenda-skip-deadline-prewarning-if-scheduled prior to
 scheduled date
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 13:27:07 +0100
Message-ID: <878vaqeq90.fsf@pc130-c703.uibk.ac.at>
References: <87wqypedlk.fsf@pc130-c703.uibk.ac.at> <87zk3lmelw.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87txthh4a0.fsf@pc130-c703.uibk.ac.at> <878vaqsxsw.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44690)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Justus-bulk@piater.name>) id 1TSRxR-0003Gz-8X
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:27:14 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Justus-bulk@piater.name>) id 1TSRxQ-0004Am-AB
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:27:13 -0400
Received: from lmr1.uibk.ac.at ([138.232.1.142]:39914 helo=smtp.uibk.ac.at)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Justus-bulk@piater.name>) id 1TSRxP-0004AY-W9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Oct 2012 08:27:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: <878vaqsxsw.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sun, 28
	Oct 2012 11:20:15 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> wrote on Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:20:15
+0100:

> I would have integrated the (if ds ...) within the cond (i.e (cond
> ((not ds) nil) ...))

Oh yes!  Please do :-)

Justus