From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Prefix arguments, checklists, and lists Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:08:00 +0100 Message-ID: <878v7q2o9b.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38870) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TwJAp-0006kE-Id for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:08:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TwJAk-0002Iq-2r for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:08:27 -0500 Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]:55444) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TwJAj-0002Ic-Qx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 16:08:21 -0500 Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id dr1so644146wgb.1 for ; Fri, 18 Jan 2013 13:08:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Robert Horn's message of "Thu, 17 Jan 2013 12:07:37 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Robert Horn Cc: Org-mode Hello, Robert Horn writes: > The keystroke bindings for lists need some examination and repair. In 7.9.3 the situation is: > > | Keystrokes | First Item | Any other item | > |---------------------+-----------------------------------+---------------------------| > | C-c C-c | Toggle completion this item | Toggle this item | > | C-u C-c C-c | Toggle checkbox on/off whole list | Toggle checkbox this item | > | C-u C-u C-c C-c | Set in-progess whole list | Set in-progress this item | > | M-- C-c C-c | Toggle completion whole list | Toggle this item | > | M-- C-u C-c C-c | Toggle completion whole list | Toggle this item | > | M-- C-u C-u C-c C-c | Toggle completion whole list | Toggle this item | > > > Is this what is really intended? The present behavior has the odd > result that there is no sequence to toggle presence of checkbox for > the first item, and there is no sequence to set in-progress for the > first item. The first item must be manually edited. (Or maybe there's > another sequence that I haven't found.) > > I think this is a bug. But the intended behavior is unclear, and the > proper fix is unclear. I plan to rewrite C-c C-c using Elements, so the behaviour will slightly change. It will be better to discuss about checkboxes when this change is done. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou