From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christopher Schmidt <christopher@ch.ristopher.com>
Subject: Re: Bug in structmode++?
Date: Mon,  6 May 2013 18:07:20 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <878v3s829x@ch.ristopher.com>
References: <20130501150351.GA1891@pedroche.intern>
	<20130502083120.GJ1647@pedroche.uni-erfurt.de>
	<877gjhixw9.fsf@gmail.com>
	<20130502085151.GM1647@pedroche.uni-erfurt.de>
	<87r4hph59q.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37827)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <christopher@ch.ristopher.com>) id 1UZOst-0000eU-JU
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 13:07:38 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <christopher@ch.ristopher.com>) id 1UZOsl-0004Qm-42
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 13:07:31 -0400
Received: from ristopher.com ([146.185.21.93]:45741
	helo=saturn.ch.ristopher.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <christopher@ch.ristopher.com>) id 1UZOsk-0004QF-SS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 06 May 2013 13:07:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87r4hph59q.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Thu,
	02 May 2013 15:37:21 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
> Igor Sosa Mayor <joseleopoldo1792@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Thanks Nicolas. At least, I dont feel alone anymore... Is there any
>> chance this getting fixed somehow? I used to use it very often in my
>> emails and I miss it.
>
> I miss it, too.
>
> I didn't follow recent changes to orgstruct-mode, so I cannot help
> here.  I hope that someone more knowledgeable than I am will jump in.

orgstruct(++)-mode used to set auto-fill-function to
'org-auto-fill-function.  This behaviour is too intrusive so we removed
it.  You either need to indent secondary lines by hand or set
auto-fill-function back to org-auto-fill-function.

orgstruct++'s hijacker of org-insert-heading-respect-content did not
respect item bodies.  I fixed this in master a few minutes ago.

    741bc5c * origin/master master org.el: Execute org-insert-heading
    and org-insert-heading-respect-content in orgstruct++-mode when the
    context around point is an item-body.

        Christopher