Øyvind Stegard <oyvinst@ifi.uio.no> writes:

> Daimrod <daimrod@gmail.com> writes:
>
> [...]
>
>> Thanks for the bug report!
>>
>> Don't you think that checking if one of the buffer would be enough and
>> faster?
>> With something like (every #'get-file-buffer org-contacts-files)
>
> Hi,
>
> I thought about that, yes. But what about when an org-contacts buffer is
> killed and subsequently re-opened (like using `find-alternate-file' with
> same file name). Then the buffer will exist for the file, but it will be
> a new instance, and the markers in org-contacts-db will still be dead.
> That's why I decided to just check the markers instead.

You're right, good catch!

I've installed the patch and haven't felt any slowdown, but I've a small
contacts file. If people complain about slowdown we could add a buffer
local hook to ask before killing contacts files.

> Regards,
>
> Øyvind

-- 
Daimrod/Greg