From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: org-insert-heading Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 18:46:53 +0100 Message-ID: <878uwqev02.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87wqkcznir.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2m4s7zh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42438) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vh106-0006ul-O9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:46:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vh101-0003ZL-CW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:46:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87d2m4s7zh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Wed, 13 Nov 2013 15:15:46 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: Org-mode , "Thomas S. Dye" Hello, Bastien writes: > Confirmed -- I quickly looked, it seems that `org-in-item-p' should do > a better job when preceeded by invisible text. I need to rewrite this function. Anyway, I'm not sure what you mean in your last sentence because, as a low-level function, its results shouldn't be affected by folding status of the document (I didn't follow the thread closely, though, and could be off tracks). Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou