From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Should org-narrow-to-subtree be disabled by default? Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 16:25:12 +0100 Message-ID: <878uwfgmxz.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52366) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkF5K-0006oh-4Y for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:25:34 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkF5B-0006bJ-OP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:25:26 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]:38421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VkF5B-0006bA-HZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 10:25:17 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id u56so2292785wes.11 for ; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 07:25:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Jisang Yoo's message of "Sat, 23 Nov 2013 22:55:40 +0900") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jisang Yoo Cc: emacs-orgmode Hi Jisang, one good way to decide could be to ask people here if they ever accidentally narrowed the view to a subtree -- I never did. Also, I tend to think Emacs is on the paranoid side here, I don't think newbies can hit C-x n n accidentally... Let me know what you think, -- Bastien