From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [Bug] commit 39070b7fc7 breaks babel test Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 22:48:37 +0100 Message-ID: <878uvxlkga.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87eh622s3g.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <87ob4t6b3q.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vp3Gr-0008KR-QA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:49:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vp3GP-0001lY-0G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:49:13 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]:62935) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vp3GO-0001lM-Pz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:48:44 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so1272496wes.13 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 13:48:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Skip Collins's message of "Fri, 6 Dec 2013 15:51:42 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Skip Collins Cc: Achim Gratz , emacs-org list , Eric Schulte Hi Skip, Skip Collins writes: > Designating something as an expected failure seems to be a good way to > track minor issues that need eventually to be resolved. As a user, I > frequently update with make up2 just to avoid getting bitten by stupid > errors that might sneak into master. Is it really that much extra work > for a developer to run the same command before committing and either > fix the error or mark it as a known failure? I'm for a relaxed policy here. Users living on the master branch know they are testing an unstable version of Org, and such hiccups just happen. -- Bastien