From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Behavior of M-q on comments in code blocks Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:18:55 +0100 Message-ID: <878utpy1lc.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <86fvnxg7o9.fsf@somewhere.org> <87r47hahnq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86a9e5bqh5.fsf@somewhere.org> <87txcdmvho.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <86wqh9a83q.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49029) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB5CQ-0008VV-Qi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:19:48 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB5CL-0006E0-1B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:19:42 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:36529) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB5CK-0006Ds-Qq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 11:19:36 -0500 Received: from public by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WB5CK-0007E0-8G for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 17:19:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <86wqh9a83q.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Wed, 05 Feb 2014 16:32:09 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > Though, when doing it on the first line (comment), we don't have the > same behavior whether the `M-q' is done on the code block itself (in the > Org file) or in the indirect buffer: while the first fails, the latter > does work as expected. See http://screencast.com/t/iwE7xbxKj. I've seen this but I've no time for this right now and the fix in Emacs will also fix this -- feel free to explore, of course! -- Bastien