From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Proposal for images in markdown export (ox-md) Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 17:43:54 +0100 Message-ID: <878utincj9.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87eh3b9w0a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50741) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCtxL-00063B-I1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:43:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WCtxG-0005LN-3d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 11:43:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87eh3b9w0a.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (Bastien's message of "Mon, 10 Feb 2014 10:07:01 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode Hello, Bastien writes: >> So, my proposal would be that if either are present, Org could >> (should?) use html image specifications instead of markdown. > > I'll let Nicolas decide on this. FWIW, I think it makes sense to switch to HTML when attributes are given. Though, I don't use Markdown, so I may overlook something. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou