From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jacek Generowicz <jacek.generowicz@cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Some thoughts on MobileOrg and its development ....
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:10:52 +0200
Message-ID: <878umsstbn.fsf@generowicz.net>
References: <87a97e1mp3.fsf@gmail.com> <8638d6wav8.fsf@gmail.com>
	<53eaba61.0315320a.67ec.ffffc1ed@mx.google.com>
	<CAJdTJyMhJ1AxMnN9tAPM-eZMj6vCCG66Bvo8hP+WsxzGXRYxHA@mail.gmail.com>
	<53eacc31.8649320a.5dd1.084d@mx.google.com>
	<87ha1hxfq1.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51035)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Jacek.Generowicz@cern.ch>) id 1XHTeQ-0000ta-AK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:11:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Jacek.Generowicz@cern.ch>) id 1XHTeH-0006bA-8o
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:11:18 -0400
Received: from cernmx11.cern.ch ([188.184.36.50]:43846)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Jacek.Generowicz@cern.ch>) id 1XHTeH-0006az-2C
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Aug 2014 04:11:09 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87ha1hxfq1.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> writes:

> One could, for example, create an entirely new project on GitHub
> called 'MobileOrgRebooted', and create entirely new apps in the
> respective stores using that name.

That strikes me as the sensible thing to do.

> (As it is, there's not a uniformly named app in any case - we have
> 'MobileOrg' for iOS, and 'MobileOrg-Android' for, well, Android.)

There's also MobileOrgNG for Android.

> And it certainly seems to me that it would be best to start the actual
> coding of the reboot /first/, and only worry about naming rights
> issues if and when it takes off. Doing otherwise is likely to bring
> into play another possible obstacle to getting actual implementation
> happening.

Agreed.