From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: org-element-at-point fails in programming-modes Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:03:31 +0200 Message-ID: <878umhvcdo.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87zjez9xqc.fsf@gmail.com> <87vbpn9x6u.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49520) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKYaZ-0006mi-0e for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:04:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKYaR-0006Qu-DS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:04:02 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59599) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XKYaR-0006Qe-72 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 16:03:55 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XKYaH-00070p-Kc for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:03:45 +0200 Received: from e179067030.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.179.67.30]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:03:45 +0200 Received: from rasmus by e179067030.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 22:03:45 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Thorsten, Thorsten Jolitz writes: > As a side-remark, I did send these blocks with emptly lines between them, > and when I look at my post in gmane the format looks alright, however > when I open it in gnus the empty lines are gone and it looks like this: Do you by any chance have `gnus-article-strip-all-blank-lines' (W E A from summary) in your `gnus-article-mode-hook' or, more dangerously, in your `nnmail-prepare-incoming-hook'? I have had terrible things happen when I applied "washing" automatically. (info "(gnus) article washing") —Rasmus -- This space is left intentionally blank