From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Subject: Re: Org-mode reinvented?
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2015 19:16:47 +0100
Message-ID: <878u6qzucw.fsf@mbork.pl>
References: <87fv10hh8z.fsf@mbork.pl> <m2k2qbkxrr.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu>
	<m2k2qbgcxe.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39289)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1ZqPqq-00072l-4o
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:17:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1ZqPqm-0006zT-5I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:17:04 -0400
Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([2a01:5e00:2:52::8]:34680)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1ZqPql-0006zP-Ub
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2015 14:17:00 -0400
In-reply-to: <m2k2qbgcxe.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com>
Cc: Org-Mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>, John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>


On 2015-10-25, at 16:55, Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2015-10-25 at 07:12, John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu> wrote:
>> Interesting. One day I imagine something like this, or sharelatex
>> exists for collaborating on org-files with people who don't like
>> Emacs...
>
> One can hope, but unfortunately it seems Markdown is the default implementation for people supporting a simple markup language.

Yes.  Sometimes I wish Org-mode used Markdown by default.  Then, I start
to think "yes, fine, but /which/ Markdown?", and I feel better;-).

(The problem with Markdown seems to be that there is no "official"
version.  Also, if Org-mode were tied to some external standard, Org's
own development - like in "adding new features" - would become
problematic.)

>   -k.

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University