From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arun Isaac <arunisaac@systemreboot.net>
Subject: Re: Programmatically constructing org documents
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:20:22 +0530
Message-ID: <878txr7mrl.fsf@systemreboot.net>
References: <m2bn2o3rxw.fsf@Johns-MacBook-Air.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52313)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arunisaac@hrrol>) id 1bHG4t-0006yJ-WF
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:50:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arunisaac@hrrol>) id 1bHG4p-0004rW-TR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:50:47 -0400
Received: from [117.218.232.8] (port=39120 helo=hrrol)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <arunisaac@hrrol>) id 1bHG4p-0004rF-B9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jun 2016 15:50:43 -0400
In-reply-to: <m2bn2o3rxw.fsf@Johns-MacBook-Air.local>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


> I don't know if there is a "correct" way. It might depend on how
> sophisticated the document is. I usually use strings and format.
> Sometimes that is a pain though, if there is a lot of conditional
> formatting. So the question is which is easier for your situation, and I
> would say easier is "correct" ;)

Fair enough. Sounds good. Thank you.