From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: org-table: Can't assign numbers to range
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:06:55 +0100
Message-ID: <878tperpwg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <2017-02-08T16-23-32@devnull.Karl-Voit.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42744)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ccDiw-0004g0-UR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:07:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1ccDit-00056k-OE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:07:02 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:49710)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1ccDit-00056e-Id
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Feb 2017 11:06:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <2017-02-08T16-23-32@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> (Karl Voit's message
	of "Wed, 8 Feb 2017 16:25:10 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at>
Cc: Karl Voit <news1142@Karl-Voit.at>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Karl Voit <devnull@Karl-Voit.at> writes:

> Hi!
>
> | foo |
> |-----|
> |     |
> |     |
> |-----|
> |     |
> |     |
> |-----|
>
> #+TBLFM: @I$1..@II$1=1 :: @II$1..@III$1=2
>
> Results in "user-error: Can't assign to hline relative reference"
>
> Why?

Because "@I$1..@II$1" is not as obvious as you may think at first
thought. As a consequence, it is forbidden.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou