From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Bug: xxx [9.3 (9.3-8-geab7c4-elpa @ c:/Users/Scott/.emacs.d/elpa/org-20191209/)] Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:44:38 -0500 Message-ID: <878sncw77t.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38175) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1igtUI-00005Q-VX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:44:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1igtUH-0007Pw-UZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:44:50 -0500 Received: from 195-159-176-226.customer.powertech.no ([195.159.176.226]:40882 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1igtUH-0007ED-NH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 11:44:49 -0500 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1igtUD-000kOZ-Sa for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Dec 2019 17:44:45 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Scott Otterson writes: > A function I wrote a few months ago is now failing because it's > unable to find the org function "org-at-target-p". I think this was > originally in org.el but I can't find it there now. > > If this function was removed intentionally could someone suggest a > new function that can do the same thing? org-at-target-p used to > return true if the cursor is on a dedicated target. > This happened with commit ,---- | commit a486d9cbd7491741554944a116f81b02f6b35e4b (HEAD, refs/bisect/bad) | Author: Nicolas Goaziou | Date: Tue Nov 27 00:04:41 2018 +0100 | | Move link-related core functions out of "org.el" `---- The fact that the function disappears with no mention in the commit message (where about 60 other functions are mentioned) leads me to believe that it was unintentional, but of course, Nicolas will have to confirm one way or the other. -- Nick "There are only two hard problems in computer science: cache invalidation, naming things, and off-by-one errors." -Martin Fowler