From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [PATCH] ox.el: Fix extra character deleted in org-export--update-included-link Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 12:01:23 +0100 Message-ID: <878sl6px8c.fsf@bzg.fr> References: <86tv7lm79g.fsf@xkqr.org> <8736bhqftq.fsf@gnu.org> <874kvxxa5i.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87o8u252iv.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo8qvl5x.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57257) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2CFN-0004S7-H9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 06:01:30 -0500 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nicolas, I'm glad I replied to your email because... Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Last time we disagreed, you grossly concluded with: > > Future maintainers may of course interpret the recommendations of the > FSF differently, but that's mine for now. > > As far as my understanding permits, this means: "I'm am the one in > charge. I know what I'm doing. Discussion closed. Next." ... we are clearly miscommunicating here. When I said: Future maintainers may of course interpret the recommendations of the FSF differently, but that's mine for now. I just really meant what I said: future maintainer(s) can decide what is the best interpretation of "15 lines of (significant) changes", but since I'm the one responsible for handling copyright stuff for Org, I ask you and co-maintainers to act as if my interpretation were true. I didn't even imagine my statement could be rude, but I know see how it can be perceived as rude, given the context. Sorry for that. > I find this stance dubious, whatever the subject is, or if you are right > or wrong. To make my point go through, I'm now pushing it up to the > absurd. My intent is to warn, not to hurt. It did hurt, as sarcasm always does somehow. > I also believe that lecturing others about communication on mailing > lists, or social behaviour in general, is not helpful either. Unless, of > course, you think being patronizing is more acceptable here than being > ironic. I hope you don't. I don't. I did not want to "lecture" or to "patronize", but I wanted to express my feelings and listen to what I may have done wrong. On a more general topic, I hope you don't disagree with the addition of the GNU kind communication guidelines that I recently mentioned in the manual. -- Bastien