From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id iFnDI40rsWVUzgAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:23:57 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id iFnDI40rsWVUzgAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:23:57 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Q+WHj3FW; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1706109837; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=w8WnnI2WeGFQWTlomooZlo+jzOsvEhPKLz8A622Hv/I=; b=e0s8ngp87yLbtPuHl+2n9x01u7sdyc/XNBCksb/exm359lMa51NOLrulP6qe4cvH9S/z8g 0d0FbV8u9kXj+LWKl1tBZbBVnji8lRsCS0LfcWfZzsJPN56o4eGaCtjkVSXqOmFMkv2akB niWrVzt2p7VmVINNltNRDW/zD8ifqDFqVynmhUma1hoDC2fZ822dl60xSQqNNDw0mrte3F jZpdmrihLjJOjAzCgzsdY2dHRrfBIm718v76CBVUw0Pg49JpQGsrzINuCggLj4/D+oQpEW nTWjVX02zs5S7Hy/3QyIFxxzxXmewcPPgokoCS4qXJdFLDMKbX5aX3Npgs5LRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=Q+WHj3FW; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1706109837; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=UwHXu4WBhTGG4d3lAA+nIngtK14PkWZ/uuXaZbWX0z41CMqy8KOqU9oGSxA4I5ZmBFcMqu mBv9fhi3jbymoFQEy1L5EtmG8tx6IVJC/epM3MB2iVHzYnfcQOqnYzlHdi5eqyf+BfjqnA Dkk5/v+7NaSquBXyI+Y2/Lpj/Hv4I4klrzi76kKqwEDkIotPLzvJ8JBAvHYDqMd8mFj8CU zInyWOb/x4yXKOb7QN+clnKaNDYBEXewHjqhZChO3N4Al9CrDUofCgoKfxJmLfURpsoD22 PDslOA2d08g6uYE2x9nkItPAcH7y7VxDfrgwsLaf0PEwHCEpLH0zUlVY5+7HZQ== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B50367223 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:23:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSf5t-0000Oh-Ug; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:23:13 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSf5s-0000OW-06 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:23:12 -0500 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rSf5q-0005bP-0E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 10:23:11 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0108D240104 for ; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:23:06 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1706109786; bh=w8WnnI2WeGFQWTlomooZlo+jzOsvEhPKLz8A622Hv/I=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=Q+WHj3FW8hD0maYaogzV/C+3XBP0gpY2fZNqI9XesyOxzkf6mg5hl0yQINlUgPnQs 1BPvcEBqpKN51IogbrSNTOY+j13WQZeLhpqpoX6F49XPVuKNHaeaU03RcxFnh05ccx pOJgLUadzLhmlGTWhK1bAdVbD2PlgbLQATjRP23KhDA54ysYpmlOnW9XmrpMr7XYeJ ngGVnkz7IC6AHeGXY2mSoY7NDDOe/tRokBRPwJvGPnEIwJIC/5RGKzTMSNv0l2DizU 1uHmCqQll92O8GXslEUjBHbgiejKFkKVXLDJ95tUQYGVNOFXADdqL9Uhbn28qVhU1y 6krsEMKCyYNbQ== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4TKnlY1nNlz9rxB; Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:23:05 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Juan_Manuel_Mac=C3=ADas?= To: Max Nikulin Cc: Eric Anderson , ihor Timothy , Ihor Radchenko , orgmode Subject: Re: [BUG] Footnotes in section titles In-Reply-To: <691643eb-49d0-45c3-ab7f-a1edbd093bef@gmail.com> (Max Nikulin's message of "Wed, 24 Jan 2024 21:14:55 +0700") References: <87sf2ngcd2.fsf@localhost> <691643eb-49d0-45c3-ab7f-a1edbd093bef@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 15:23:03 +0000 Message-ID: <878r4e4uy0.fsf@posteo.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=maciaschain@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -7.39 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Spam-Score: -7.39 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7B50367223 X-TUID: eJVnuhxGLUTE Max Nikulin writes: > I recall some tricks with \footnotemark and \footnotetext, but I do > not remember details and whether it may work for section titles. > Complications may arise if a heading title has several footnotes. ox-latex has 'org-latex--delayed-footnotes-definitions': "[...] This function is used within constructs that don't support \footnote{} command (e.g., an item tag). In that case, \footnotemark is used within the construct and the function just outside of it." The \footnotetext/\footnotemark option works well for specific cases, but in general I don't like to abuse this method. > Perhaps it is better to avoid footnotes in titles and to add some > phrase to the body instead. That is the ideal scenario. I also believe that footnotes should be avoided in section headings, if possible. Or at least, have another type of numbering (symbols, letters...). The manyfoot and bigfoot packages allow constructions of this type, with various footnote apparatus. Best regards, Juan Manuel=20 --=20 Juan Manuel Mac=C3=ADas --=20