From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Sparse Trees layout
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:10:01 +0800
Message-ID: <877hxplk5r.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <82my6lc1sl.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MWgqz-0006F2-O3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:24:13 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MWgqv-0006D6-CS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:24:13 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=49467 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MWgqv-0006D0-1k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:24:09 -0400
Received: from mail-px0-f193.google.com ([209.85.216.193]:36346)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@googlemail.com>) id 1MWgqu-0000MD-C3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 21:24:08 -0400
Received: by pxi31 with SMTP id 31so1243497pxi.14
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:24:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <82my6lc1sl.fsf@gmail.com> (Cian OConnor's message of "Thu, 30
	Jul 2009 22:13:14 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Cian OConnor <cian.oconnor@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Cian OConnor <cian.oconnor@gmail.com> writes:

> Now if I go to level 3 and create a sparse tree I get this:
>     * level 3
>       * level 4
>
> Which is fine and usable, but it would be nice to have the option to
> have the following instead:
>
> * level 3
>   * level 4

Why would you want to have this?  

I find this a bit confusing...

-- 
 Bastien