From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Lundin Subject: Re: My reference data management approach with org and emacs Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:07:43 -0400 Message-ID: <877ho8kjg0.fsf@fastmail.fm> References: <4BBFB8C0.8070208@jboecker.de> <4BC625AC.3000201@jboecker.de> <9A628BC4-5EA4-4B44-9624-E681FB858576@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1O2Nqf-0000tb-GI for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:07:09 -0400 Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52967 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1O2Nqe-0000tL-Ad for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:07:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2Nqc-0005lr-F3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:07:08 -0400 Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:45208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1O2Nqc-0005le-7H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:07:06 -0400 In-Reply-To: <9A628BC4-5EA4-4B44-9624-E681FB858576@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:14:39 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Claus Klingberg , Org Mode Carsten Dominik writes: > On Apr 15, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Alexander Poslavsky wrote: > >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:29 PM, Jan B=C3=B6cker >> wrote: >> I have published a more detailed description of my setup, including >> the >> source code, here: >> >> http://www.jboecker.de/2010/04/14/general-reference-filing-with-org-mode= .html >> >> Wow, this is a very nice setup, and a good way to see how org- >> attachments can be used in practice. Maybe a link to worg/tutorials >> would be ok? > > Definitely. Can please someone make that link? > Done. - Matt