From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Re: [bug] latex export ignores
 org-export-latex-default-packages-alist?
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:28:10 +0000
Message-ID: <877hdra82d.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <87sjwfd6i5.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <80hbcvps3m.fsf@missioncriticalit.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39363 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pi9AP-0008IN-VI
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:28:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Pi9AG-0002Rl-S0
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:28:22 -0500
Received: from vscane-b.ucl.ac.uk ([144.82.108.141]:36722)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1Pi9AG-0002RB-JO
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 12:28:16 -0500
In-Reply-To: <80hbcvps3m.fsf@missioncriticalit.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22S=C3=A9b?=
	=?utf-8?Q?astien?= Vauban"'s
	message of "Wed, 26 Jan 2011 17:06:21 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9bastien?= Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

S=C3=A9bastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com> writes:

> Hi Eric,
>

[...]

> For test purpose, a silly workaround: what about removing the line?  That=
 way,
> we could see if either:
>
> - the nil option is not respected,
> - the t option comes from somewhere else..
>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

No need. the problem was my lack of careful reading of the documentation
and assuming that the third argument indicated whether the package
should be included or not; in fact, it indicates whether it should be
used for latex snippets.

Thanks,
eric

--=20
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1
: using Org-mode version 7.4 (release_7.4.239.g65ac.dirty)