From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Let's stick to one list for now (was: Splitting mailing list) Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 12:02:02 +0100 Message-ID: <877hcks9qt.fsf_-_@gnu.org> References: <87k4gldb1s.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <4D6B6FFA.50706@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=34204 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pu0rt-0006FZ-8d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:02:22 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pu0rj-0003CG-Bh for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:02:21 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:51837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pu0rj-0003Bq-77 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 06:02:11 -0500 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so4197836fxm.0 for ; Mon, 28 Feb 2011 03:02:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D6B6FFA.50706@gmail.com> (Torsten Wagner's message of "Mon, 28 Feb 2011 18:50:50 +0900") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Torsten Wagner Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Dear all, thanks all for your input. Let's stick to one list for now, and let's try to use the [DEV] tag for emails that only target development. It's not automatic and people will forget sometimes, but on the overrall this will improve the readability of the list, for both developers and users. Right now developers can already focus on emails with [PATCH] tag and on the patchwork here: http://patchwork.newartisans.com/project/org-mode/list/ Julien, I guess your life would be easier if you get push access to the Org repo and an account on the patchwork -- so that you can test patches and improve them if needed. Would that be okay for you? This decision is not carved in stone -- but I'm about to release Org 7.5 and I don't want to undertake a mailing list split in the middle of this process. Let's see how things go till Org 7.6 and raise the question if that's an issue again by then. Thanks, -- Bastien