From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Maus Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] loop over headlines in active region Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:52:46 +0200 Message-ID: <877h5h7lwx.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> References: <87obzpl3ec.fsf@gnu.org> <1314246334-5053-1-git-send-email-dmaus@ictsoc.de> <87d3ftiz11.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkitabb4.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <87bouw404u.fsf@gmail.com> <87obyu4awt.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <877h5i3tbc.fsf@gmail.com> <87bout7nv1.wl%dmaus@ictsoc.de> <87zkid3ff0.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Sep__9_17:52:46_2011-1"; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46242) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R23Nt-0001pd-Eg for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:52:55 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R23Ns-0007j2-8l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:52:53 -0400 Received: from app1b.xlhost.de ([213.202.242.162]:38311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R23Nr-0007ih-TB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Sep 2011 11:52:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87zkid3ff0.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Cc: David Maus , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Sep__9_17:52:46_2011-1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable At Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:26:43 +0200, =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec wrote: >=20 > The reason I asked (I didn't actually repeat anything, and it's all > apparently still far from obvious, at least to me) is that I'm confused: > You say "I didn't implement is as a macro, because A". Now we both agree > that A is an invalid argument. Given that you now also confirmed you did > want to implement it as a macro in the first place, I would expect that > either you do implement it as a macro, or provide a valid argument for > not doing so. Maybe I really am too dense, but the hitchhiker quotation > didn't help. Okay, now I get it. Do I implement a macro for the operation? I Don't know. Please see http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/44422/focus=3D46184 Best, -- David --=20 OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6 Jabber.... dmjena@jabber.org Email..... dmaus@ictsoc.de --pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Sep__9_17:52:46_2011-1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iF4EABEIAAYFAk5qNk4ACgkQma24O1pEeOYd5gEAp89wwVwAII/mdgLZJkQP/X2u wXcCZBrgrUk5nNdgKM8BANWXwO5Gt8vlZpAl4av4VwOyeSplFn+RDAelaTWnkHoY =E6/o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pgp-sign-Multipart_Fri_Sep__9_17:52:46_2011-1--