From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Running babel blocks in :noexport: sections
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 22:14:34 +0200
Message-ID: <877gqbk6z9.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CA+M2ft-jNSi4NOd5JuGFL7Tu4mw-3Ob4Xmg77HYsd0tGXs2BZw@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48286)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TSCpR-0005mo-JE
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:17:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TSCpQ-0002wi-QQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:17:57 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:63210)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1TSCpQ-0002wT-JS
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:17:56 -0400
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u3so2211174wey.0
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 27 Oct 2012 13:17:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+M2ft-jNSi4NOd5JuGFL7Tu4mw-3Ob4Xmg77HYsd0tGXs2BZw@mail.gmail.com>
	(John Hendy's message of "Sat, 27 Oct 2012 14:03:20 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:

> Is this a bug/inappropriate setting, desirable based on how others use
> :noexport: headlines, or would others see value in executing babel
> blocks in :noexport: headlines?
>
> If I /didn't/ want it executed, I'd use :execute no.

This is the behaviour of the new export engine. The current exporter
removes :noexport: sections before executing src blocks within (it
always did).


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou