From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Philipp Kroos Subject: Re: subtree-export limitations Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 16:12:05 +0100 Message-ID: <877gpkb6wq.fsf@t-online.de> References: <87r4ntmu00.fsf@t-online.de> <20121116163645.GF24384@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87lie0bemn.fsf@t-online.de> <87y5i0o0nd.fsf@gmail.com> <87txsonyka.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49427) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZk43-0008VW-5t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 10:12:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZk40-0000AY-3U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 10:12:11 -0500 Received: from mailout05.t-online.de ([194.25.134.82]:38958) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TZk3z-0000AQ-Si for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 10:12:08 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87txsonyka.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sat, 17 Nov 2012 14:33:57 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> It might support "Property+" syntax, but it looks like this is >> Babel-specific (no sign of such syntax in org.el, where property API is >> defined). I will look into it (unless you want to do it). > > Well, scratch that: it already support :property+: syntax. I.e. try to > export subtree with: > > * Test export > :PROPERTIES: > :export_latex_header: header1 > :export_latex_header+: header2 > :END: > > Test Amazing! I didn't even know about the property+-syntax... Now that's not as good as it *could* get since the headerlines are separated by space rather than newline, but it's another very useful option for a workaround at least. After all, I think that a complete solution to this problem would break the consistency of properties, like you said, or would have to introduce yet another kind of syntax, what is clearly no option. That said, I'm fine with the situation, but I'ld suggest a note in the documentation that makes this limitation to subtree-exports clear (and possibly points out the workarounds). What do you think? Philipp