From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jambunathan K Subject: TexInfo conversion of Org syntax (Success!) Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2013 13:36:03 +0530 Message-ID: <877glf8ys4.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEbGd-0001Pz-7m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:06:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEbGc-0000ut-01 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:06:03 -0400 Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com ([209.85.160.54]:63177) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UEbGb-0000ul-R7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:06:01 -0400 Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id rr4so2659708pbb.41 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 00:06:01 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org TexInfo conversion of Org syntax (Success!) The info file looks good. But, I feel some stylistic aspects can be improved. Eval this form (info "/home/kjambunathan/src/worg/dev/org-syntax.info" nil) Or try C-u M-x info RET org-syntax.info RET