From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd) Subject: Re: Org Community Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:08:52 -0400 Message-ID: <877gl8wvi3.fsf@adboyd.com> References: <513CBC82.4000600@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41261) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGWFn-0003eo-AO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:09:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGWFl-00025Z-Uy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:09:07 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34063) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UGWFl-00025V-Os for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:09:05 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UGWG6-0004I3-MG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:09:26 +0100 Received: from 72.185.97.240 ([72.185.97.240]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:09:26 +0100 Received: from david by 72.185.97.240 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:09:26 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org "Loyall, David" writes: > FWIW, I believe that the org-mode community should do what we can to > oblige Jambunathan's request, even if/when we're not legally required > to do so. I think that we should do the same for any human who wants > to withdraw from an endeavor. (Don't each of you feel that your code > is a part of you?) > > Supposing that the group agrees that the code should be removed > somehow, then at that point we can think about the most orderly way to > do it. What happens, technically, if we mark it all as deprecated? > I look at it this way. If I helped build a house for Habitat for Humanity, then a while later decided I didn't like what they stand for, do I have the right to go take out the beams I nailed into the structure? Dave