From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: GFDL Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 16:42:13 +0100 Message-ID: <877gl3usnl.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <878v5wwr96.fsf@Rainer.invalid> <6D1B3E63-A3F0-447E-A1F4-12F8B3156DB9@gmail.com> <513BD73C.3050704@gmail.com> <58FF2382-A0A8-47E2-BEA0-8E88542C6638@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI1gL-0002bI-GV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:54:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI1gJ-0002Dh-9E for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:54:45 -0400 Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]:55235) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UI1gJ-0002Cz-3B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:54:43 -0400 Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id d46so702144wer.3 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 11:54:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <58FF2382-A0A8-47E2-BEA0-8E88542C6638@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 19 Mar 2013 07:44:51 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Alan L Tyree Hi Carsten, Carsten Dominik writes: > I find it very hard to believe that this must be the case. It > bothers me mostly for the guide, where I did spend a lot of time to > make it compact, and now something like one fifth of it is license > text. We may actually consider to re-release the guide under a > different license. It has to be noted that this policy has only been recently observed for Emacs manuals... before I asked about the GPL licensing of Org's manual on emacs-devel, there were a few manuals that still didn't embed the license. Also, I don't think this policy needs to be applied to orgguide.texi since it is not distributed with GNU Emacs. A simple sentence like "You should have received a version of the GNU FDL license with GNU Emacs" should be okay IMO. Best, -- Bastien