From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bernt Hansen Subject: Re: Highlighting bug with org-agenda-set-restriction-lock Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 09:20:53 -0400 Message-ID: <877gkhyuyy.fsf@norang.ca> References: <87bo9tyvdj.fsf@norang.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UO6Zg-0001DK-On for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 09:21:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UO6Zc-0005D9-QQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 09:21:00 -0400 Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:18561) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UO6Zc-0005D2-JO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 09:20:56 -0400 Received: from cpe000102d0fe75-cm0012256ecbde.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com ([99.239.165.89] helo=mail.norang.ca) by mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UO6Zc-000OGR-47 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 13:20:56 +0000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (gollum.intra.norang.ca [192.168.1.5]) by mail.norang.ca (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r35DKsAR026342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:20:55 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (gollum [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.localdomain (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r35DKsmX017017 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2013 09:20:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87bo9tyvdj.fsf@norang.ca> (Bernt Hansen's message of "Fri, 05 Apr 2013 09:12:08 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Bernt Hansen writes: > I also noticed that the main heading is now also highlighted in the > agenda which is okay I guess but also different from how this used to > work :) This is unrelated - it's highlighted because it is my current clocking task. :) Thanks, Bernt