From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Schulte Subject: Re: Naming a table produced by a CALL Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 10:44:46 -0700 Message-ID: <877g9my2k6.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zjml61t9.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <8738kd1qh2.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> <87txct5vbs.fsf@hornfels.zedat.fu-berlin.de> <87y524z996.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47191) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7VG4-0006n0-4W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:20:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7VFy-0007QL-VZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:20:40 -0500 Received: from mail-pb0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22c]:59487) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W7VFy-0007Nu-Ab for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:20:34 -0500 Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id rq2so5103804pbb.3 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:20:33 -0800 (PST) List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Leha Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Andreas Leha writes: > Hi Loris, > > "Loris Bennett" writes: > >> Andreas Leha writes: >> >>> "Loris Bennett" writes: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have a CALL which produces a table, which just gets the keyword >>>> RESULT. I would like to plot the data in the table with R and so would >>>> like to refer to the data in the table. >>>> >>>> It seems I need to need to replace RESULT by NAME in >>>> org-babel-results-keyword, but how do I pass the actual name? >>>> >>>> Cheers, >>>> >>>> Loris >>> >>> Make the CALL named: >>> >>> #+name: foo >>> #+call: foo() >>> >>> HTH, >>> Andreas >> >> Thanks. In retrospect, that seems quite obvious. Where is this >> documented and should it be mentioned here: >> >> http://orgmode.org/manual/Evaluating-code-blocks.html >> > > This is a 'not-so-old' feature. Yes, I believe this was added in the last month or two. > And I do not know whether it is documented at all. I agree that > 'Evaluating code blocks' is where the documentation should go. > I'll happily apply a documentation patch. I don't believe the copyright assignment required for code contributions is required for contributions to the documentation. Best, > > Regards, > Andreas > > >> ? >> >> Cheers, >> >> Loris > > -- Eric Schulte https://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte PGP: 0x614CA05D