From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Quotes for LaTeX export Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 15:31:37 +0100 Message-ID: <877g993a2e.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87eh3iftc7.fsf@gmx.us> <87a9e6v8ib.fsf@alphaville.bos.redhat.com> <87bnymngrg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87k3d93cl6.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB3Va-000470-98 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:31:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WB3VU-0001xj-Ji for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 09:31:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Laurens Van Houtven's message of "Wed, 5 Feb 2014 15:05:33 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Laurens Van Houtven <_@lvh.io> Cc: Bastien , Nick Dokos , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Laurens Van Houtven <_@lvh.io> writes: > On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > >> We already have a working solution for many languages, and more general >> that this LaTeX-centered command. It has limitations, but "csquotes" >> support would inherit them anyway since it would be built on top of >> smart quotes mechanism. >> > > This is only for LaTeX-export, so I don't see how LaTeX-centered is > relevant. I really don't see how it affects other export langs; The current quote mechanism is built at the export framework level so that each export back-end doesn't need to bring up its own recipe. I'd rather not add back-end specific code unless it is an improvement. So far, I don't see the improvement. Do you have an example of an Org document that produces a wrong tex file, which would be correct if it used "csquotes"? > plus, it was in the old LaTeX exporter anyway! True. And? I gave you a solution to use "csquotes" feature in your documents. > The reason is that the exporter occasionally produces TeX code that renders > poorly on some setups (we're still figuring out which those are exactly). > csquotes never does this. I assume it will render poorly in setups that do not use that package. I'm surprised that "csquotes" is compulsory in some setups. Of course, it would be good to know about them so we can find a workaround. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou