From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: searching for csv utilities Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:22:35 -0400 Message-ID: <877frjh51g.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> References: <87d21ciu82.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <87zj4gos5w.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40478) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0Wz4-0001WK-TW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:23:09 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0Wz0-0007mJ-NF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:23:06 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:41439) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0Wz0-0007m4-Fr for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 11:23:02 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0Wyr-0005BC-1K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:22:53 +0200 Received: from nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:22:53 +0200 Received: from ndokos by nat-pool-bos-t.redhat.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:22:53 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Michael Brand writes: > Hi Eric > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 9:21 AM, wrote: >> however, vstdev does not appear to work? > > My mistake, it should be vsdev or vpsdev. > I mispelled it the same way: I can never remember the right name. Also, if one uses a format on an undefined function (e.g. using vmode(@I..@II); %.2f), I get 0.0 as a result and the error is hidden - if the format is omitted, the literal vmode([...]) appears in the table, so in that case at least one gets a hint that something is wrong. That probably qualifies as a bug, but I don't know how easy it would be to fix. Nick