From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kyle Meyer Subject: Re: Bug: org-babel-tangle-publish fails in copy-file step [8.3.1 (release_8.3.1-241-gea7ac0 @ /home/arunisaac/.emacs.d/org-mode/lisp/)] Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:13:24 -0400 Message-ID: <877fn38ut7.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <20150918143040.GA10797@steel> <87r3lciqbm.fsf@kyleam.com> <20151003090239.GA11623@steel> <87oagf98v9.fsf@kyleam.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45034) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiV3e-0003pV-Aq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:13:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiV3a-0004DE-Pz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:13:33 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f44.google.com ([209.85.192.44]:34141) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiV3a-0004CX-Lp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 18:13:30 -0400 Received: by qgez77 with SMTP id z77so122315205qge.1 for ; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 15:13:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87oagf98v9.fsf@kyleam.com> (Kyle Meyer's message of "Sat, 03 Oct 2015 13:09:46 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Arun I Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Kyle Meyer writes: > Arun I writes: > >>> Thanks for the detailed report and reproducible example, and sorry for >>> the late reply. Fixed in 36233d976d. >> >> That works! Thanks. >> >> But, a new bug seems to have been introduced or was already there. >> >> When the publishing directory does not already exist (in my case, >> ~/.emacs.d/org-tangle-bug/pub), I get >> >> (file-error "Opening output file" "is a directory" >> "~/.emacs.d/org-tangle-bug/pub/") >> >> If I'm correct, org-babel-tangle-publish should create the publishing >> directory if it does not already exist. > > Hmm ... I don't see how that could have been introduced by 36233d976d, > but I agree that the directory should be created if needed. I'll have a > look later today. Fixed in 2c349cc65. -- Kyle