From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: setting local variables Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 21:21:32 +0200 Message-ID: <877ewr7t8j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <871sotiqld.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87r2wsly88.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877eykbpho.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87wp5dmkm0.fsf@gmx.us> <87h8wh13tm.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87y3psp5ne.fsf@gmx.us> <87mv68159v.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87h8wgov62.fsf@gmx.us> <87fuc0asaq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87y3pr7pn2.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874lsfaho3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87pob2opic.fsf@gmx.us> <87k21azncs.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87bmmm4kny.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <08f7ca4a-a19e-8dcb-b877-d306dda5c5b4@gmail.com> <87vakco0f5.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56113) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dv72b-0005pc-F3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:21:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dv72Y-0004Lq-C2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:21:41 -0400 Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.196]:43201) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dv72Y-0004L7-64 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Sep 2017 15:21:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu, 21 Sep 2017 11:58:09 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Carsten Dominik Cc: org-mode list , Rasmus Hello, Carsten Dominik writes: > yes, I am aware that LaTeX does use unnumbered for this, but this is > backend specific implementation, and not an argument about the logic of > this approach. Fair enough. I reverted the commit. I think a :NOTOC: property to ignore headlines from TOC is an acceptable solution, even though it add yet another property. I also suggest to classify LaTeX issue as "wontfix". Any objection? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou