From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: stardiviner <numbchild@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: How to make agenda generation faster
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 08:04:16 +0800
Message-ID: <877eieiyyn.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87h8hy1ho5.fsf@mbork.pl> <87o9c34ocl.fsf@alphapapa.net>
	<877eirdrqt.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87ftx5fx3n.fsf@alphapapa.net>
	<87pnw8engh.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87h8hkqtfb.fsf@alphapapa.net>
	<87r2gm6fdp.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Reply-To: numbchild@gmail.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53440)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <numbchild@gmail.com>) id 1gDIHO-0004ew-U2
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 20:04:42 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <numbchild@gmail.com>) id 1gDIHF-0007vP-A8
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 20:04:34 -0400
Received: from [61.175.244.13] (port=34669 helo=dark.localdomain)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <numbchild@gmail.com>) id 1gDIH7-0007bq-W6
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Oct 2018 20:04:25 -0400
In-reply-to: <87r2gm6fdp.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Cc: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


>> However, before it could be suitable as a possible replacement, it will
>> likely require more optimization.  Some queries, especially more complex
>> ones, are slower than the equivalent searches and agendas in the current
>> Org Agenda code.  This is because of the way the queries run predicates
>> on each heading.  Despite the current Org Agenda code's complexity, it
>> is well optimized and hard to beat.
>
> Are you saying that queries are turned into regexp searches within Org
> files? If so, I don't think they should.
>
> Queries should only operate on the output of the data extraction,
> possibly a list of defstructs. I.e., you first extract all meaningful
> data from the document (during idle time, with cache, or whatever
> optimization would be chosen), store it in an appropriate format, then
> query it.
>

I think the same way. In some language library like Clojure's enlive
handle the HTML string the same way.

--
[ stardiviner ] don't need to convince with trends.
       Blog: https://stardiviner.github.io/
       IRC(freenode): stardiviner
       GPG: F09F650D7D674819892591401B5DF1C95AE89AC3