emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
To: TEC <tecosaur@gmail.com>
Cc: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>, "emacs-orgmode@gnu.org" <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: (Feature Request) have org-edit-special work inside non-environment LaTeX blocks, i.e. \( \) and \[ \]
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 12:11:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877dx0b9yb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zh9wfish.fsf@gmail.com> (TEC's message of "Mon, 25 May 2020 17:42:30 +0800")

TEC <tecosaur@gmail.com> writes:

> -	     (end (progn (goto-char (org-element-property :end datum))
> -			 (search-backward "}" (line-beginning-position) t))))
> +	     (end (org-with-point-at (org-element-property :end datum)
> +		    (skip-chars-backward " \t")
> +		    (point))))
> +	 (list beg end (buffer-substring-no-properties beg end))))
> +      ((eq type 'latex-fragment)
> +       (let ((beg (org-element-property :begin datum))
> +	     (end (org-element-property :end datum)))

It seems you're mixing inline source blocks and LaTeX fragment. You
modified the former, but not the latter.

> +     (lambda () ; trim content
> +       (goto-char (point-min))

This is not needed. The function is always called at `point-min'.

> +       (skip-chars-forward " \t")
> +       (delete-region (point-min) (point))
> +       (goto-char (point-max))
> +       (skip-chars-backward " \t")
> +       (delete-region (point) (point-max))))

I'm not sure this clean-up is necessary. Is it?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-25 10:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-19  1:31 (Feature Request) have org-edit-special work inside non-environment LaTeX blocks, i.e. \( \) and \[ \] Timothy
2020-05-19  7:47 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-19  9:27   ` Timothy
2020-05-19  9:39     ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-19  9:45       ` Timothy
2020-05-19 13:27         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-19 13:32           ` Timothy
2020-05-19 14:09             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-19 14:12               ` Timothy
2020-05-19 14:28                 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-19 14:33                   ` Timothy
2020-05-23  9:10 ` Bastien
2020-05-23  9:20   ` tecosaur
2020-05-23  9:34     ` Bastien
2020-05-24 15:07   ` TEC
2020-05-24 15:38     ` TEC
2020-05-24 15:43       ` Timothy
2020-05-24 19:33         ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-25  1:33           ` TEC
2020-05-25  7:11             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-25  9:28           ` TEC
2020-05-25  9:41             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-25  9:42               ` TEC
2020-05-25  9:55                 ` TEC
2020-05-25 10:09                   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-25 10:09                     ` TEC
2020-05-25 10:23                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-25 10:24                         ` TEC
2020-05-25 10:32                           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-25 10:33                             ` TEC
2020-05-25 10:05                 ` TEC
2020-05-25 10:20                   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-25 10:21                     ` TEC
2020-05-25 11:27                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-25 13:22                         ` Timothy
2020-05-25 14:08                           ` TEC
2020-05-26  7:56                             ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-26  8:39                               ` Timothy
2020-05-26  9:11                                 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-26  9:23                                   ` TEC
2020-05-26 13:56                                     ` TEC
2020-05-26 21:13                                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-26 17:01                                 ` John Kitchin
2020-05-25 18:58                           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2020-05-26  4:48                             ` TEC
2020-05-25 10:11                 ` Nicolas Goaziou [this message]
2020-05-25 10:17                   ` TEC
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-18  6:44 Timothy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877dx0b9yb.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
    --to=mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr \
    --cc=bzg@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=tecosaur@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).