From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id OLJ7NU8FKV80DwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 06:50:55 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id CDAtMU8FKV98agAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 06:50:55 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 343439404D3 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 06:50:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43362 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2qmj-0001gU-EI for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 02:50:53 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:60624) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2qmM-0001gH-GX for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 02:50:30 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a]:37953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k2qmK-0005F9-KA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 02:50:30 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-x62a.google.com with SMTP id t11so2474899plr.5 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 23:50:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:references:user-agent:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=jzuSEYWkBwG8LagAb/amp/2ch66gpoCh9/QiuHE/N/c=; b=fRsKbXFyE/9ft98nYLTZvaidF1nv1nGpqJOxwLtYwtfE2a++hzx86HVUi3kguUlOqL jfQJ7kfwT7D+UZftuh7VBVvGcefVCmOKKJiv7MPSVSI3mzs4q5hsOnMxLp48J4hgucRf Spyi4LdTgACgoVWTb4eCmN9dVU5xYW3WjQxKXcq/p46SxEThuT8fhfPT3LU+7mdP0GCC iW9ub5aZK9hrQJtZo4KU/6L4Ngk8tY9/rvpm8NtS3kTg1AJYLs6UdsCQtYtBTohOOgWb wXGyNl3AbH5TXvrbvteAUx2kMTlH0dem86WC4rC9YkdSCGst7PyaRawFa3VZQSsexwL6 +KNQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:references:user-agent :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version; bh=jzuSEYWkBwG8LagAb/amp/2ch66gpoCh9/QiuHE/N/c=; b=Lf6Q4s0Zrv/IH+xZwTuCi5JF2YeS5NEHqRdlI1YS9IGK0tlcFwdkjk5x8sUFLoeeRz 7zMXBkbRzFZDWO0iwc/OtotPJleyoXAAe/TKtqj7pxzul6JKbzZugKgbQGglhz6c3RJR zjj89gt55ucWZPEMlzTGzuHSE7phWjv3IwuJ47Zp8mSy6NgWER8xVB7DREbv22oD4EY+ KT1dSNVv/JYKT2v+3LiDjklpBA2nNiRWBfpQGY2c0WDi8+C9nPISGlE781hOuHZhP22j 7+kCxMikg5ZY4jPC0C/JFEoAzam5LdMvGX5md2u7Yi+5rJoiEsgTrltEgf79GjnIOv67 QlCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532UVQVI6v4S6IRuM+CE9l7seSDTtUj+Sqil0r/zMu1xARRlwsFC roqn5xVeRxDjQc01knXIQzg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQQXDBh+8eFTSVTnBQlkrqbKclgN2t11UFdgvL2260xsyDUms6EMWMbYLMqkiSVC6p0Njl5g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9a41:: with SMTP id x1mr18956087plv.323.1596523826511; Mon, 03 Aug 2020 23:50:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (180-150-91-8.b4965b.per.nbn.aussiebb.net. [180.150.91.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w16sm1415323pjd.50.2020.08.03.23.50.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 03 Aug 2020 23:50:25 -0700 (PDT) From: TEC To: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: Website revamp? Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 14:27:51 +0800 References: <87zh95g2ns.fsf@gmail.com> <87mu3hduk1.fsf@gmail.com> <87wo2lyvid.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0yldpuj.fsf@gmail.com> <20200730172204.GB17223@volibear> <87ime4ev3s.fsf@gmail.com> <20200730190331.GD17223@volibear> <878seyhj38.fsf@gmail.com> <87wo2f7xyh.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> User-agent: mu4e 1.4.10; emacs 26.3 In-reply-to: <87wo2f7xyh.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Message-ID: <877due52hd.fsf@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::62a; envelope-from=tecosaur@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-x62a.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=fRsKbXFy; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.09 X-TUID: 0oJU4UQJOdc8 Good to hear from you! Eric S Fraga writes: > I do like the animated images in the features page! Glad you like them! I recently converted the static images to SVGs with the help of someone using Emacs27 w/ Cairo, would be nice go do something like an animated SVG in the future, but that's for (much) later :P >I do wonder about > the order of the topics within that page, e.g. working with > source code, although powerful, is probably not the lead item > for new users. However, that's a minor point at this stage. Thanks for this feedback. I prioritised the source code blocks because: a) my impression is that to Comp/Data Sci people, they are one of /the/ most compelling features of Org-mode b) they're similar to elements people are familiar with (Jupyter notebooks, R markdown), so the Comp/Data Sci segment of our audience is already roughy familiar with part of their capabilities I shifted the agenda/capture/clocking/etc. features down because a) they semantically seem like they should go together b) having them near the top pushes down too many other features too much, IMO Absolutely worth considering the order, please share any further thoughts you may have :) > More generally, can the column width for the text be a function > of the window width and have images scaled so that they are not > wider than the text column? It should be possible to have > mobile friendly without making the columns too narrow for full > desktop use. The fact that the images are much wider than the > text makes the page look ugly, in my opinion. The column width already is. I just find long lines undesirable. 50-80 characters is the standard in publishing for a reason. To quote from /The Elements of Typographic Style/, > Anything from 45 to 75 characters is widely regarded as a > satisfactory line length of line for a single-column page set in > a serifed text face in a text size. The 66-character line > (counting both letters and spaces) is widely regarded as ideal. > For multiple-column work, a better average is 40 to 50 > characters. If the type is well set and printed, lines of 85 or > 90 characters will pose no problem in discontinuous texts, such > as bibliographies, or, with generous leading, in footnotes. But > even with generous leading, a line that averages more than 75 or > So characters is likely to be too long for continuous reading. There's more to be said about line spacing and the reasons for this - if I recall correctly /A practical guide to typography/ (available online) goes over this. I look forward to hearing any further comments you may have! Timothy.