From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uK8MMd4DUV9KcQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 14:55:26 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id oGPeLN4DUV8QOAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 14:55:26 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 469BE94021E for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 14:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:44702 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDqe3-0004t2-Uc for larch@yhetil.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 10:55:23 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDqdj-0004sm-TV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 10:55:03 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:38686) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kDqdj-00039n-BF; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 10:55:03 -0400 Received: from [2a01:e35:2fe1:f780:25a4:99b5:1fc6:ff97] (port=53708 helo=guerry) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kDqdh-00026j-Sm; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 10:55:02 -0400 Received: by guerry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9FA7F1A60D38; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 16:54:59 +0200 (CEST) From: Bastien To: TEC Subject: Re: Are we still in a feature freeze? Organization: GNU References: <877dtov6wh.fsf@gmail.com> <87k0xbywxq.fsf@gnu.org> <87o8mnxi1t.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 16:54:59 +0200 Message-ID: <877dtaap18.fsf@bzg.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: org-mode-email Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.01 X-TUID: 0LgijoBlAR+G Hi Timothy, TEC writes: > Ah, I see. I was going off a line in https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html > "If you are undertaking big changes, please create a dedicated branch" > > I'm not sure if ~10 commits counted, but thought this may be the way to > go. Once again, thanks for clarifying. You're welcome -- I rephrased the sentence on worg a bit to avoid further confusion. > p.s. If you'd like a TLDR on that website thread I started I'd happily > attempt one. I just hope you don't find me too presumptions going as far > as I have without having heard your thoughts on it. Of course not! I really appreciate the time and efforts you put in this (daunting) task and I agree we should move on. I just hope it won't be too frustrating if I ask more changes or if we don't "buy" your solution entirely. I will carefully review it. Best, -- Bastien