Re: [PATCH] ob-python.el: Fix issue with sessions on remote machines

[Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>]

Hi Jack,

Jack Kamm <jackkamm@gmail.com> writes:

>> Would you be okay to add yourself as the ob-python.el maintainer?
>
> Sure, I've added myself as maintainer to the header of ob-python.el.

Thanks!

>> I suggest we have a policy that "Org maintainer(s)" have the last
>> words on everything in Org's core, but that individual maintainers,
>> when known from the header section of an Elisp file, have the very
>> "first look" on bug reports and feature suggestions.
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> I'm trying to review ob-python related patches and mail as I notice
> them, and monitor the list for mails with "python" in the subject,
> though some may fall through the cracks occasionally, especially when my
> workload is heavy.
>
> Should I merge in patches to ob-python.el, as I did here? Or should I
> simply review them, and let the core maintainers merge them in after
> review?

Sorry, my policy proposal was incomplete:

- A local maintainer is expected to reply to requests and bug reports
  regarding the local functionalities he oversees.

- A local maintainer can commit changes directly to the file(s) he
  maintains (either submitted changes or his own).

- Core maintainers have the final word on any change in any file (so
  in case of a disagreement with a local maintainer, core maintainers
  have priority.)

In general, I would like to encourage "optimistic merging" from more
"local" maintainers.

Does that sound right?  When in doubt, always discuss changes first.

Thanks!

-- 
 Bastien