From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Phil Jackson Subject: Re: Re: Release 5.22 (Carsten Dominik Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:04:38 +0000 Message-ID: <8763wjvqgp.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> References: <200802191705.m1JH5qll027622@bp34.u.washington.edu> <47BB19C0.2050508@u.washington.edu> <27254.1203446021@alphaville.zko.hp.com> <47BB2B3F.4070003@nabuli.de> <428F8D4B-88F4-4BE4-919C-1C000AB0BD66@science.uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRmks-0005kl-0S for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:04:50 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JRmkm-0005k8-62 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:04:49 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JRmkl-0005k0-SZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:04:43 -0500 Received: from a.painless.aaisp.net.uk ([81.187.30.51]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JRmkl-0005Le-Lo for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:04:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <428F8D4B-88F4-4BE4-919C-1C000AB0BD66@science.uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 19 Feb 2008 20:45:40 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: org-mode mailing list Carsten Dominik writes: >>> +1 vote on that one. I haven't tried out 5.22 yet, but the >>> M-RET/M- behavior that Scott describes, also fits my >>> way of working perfectly. >> >> >> Arghh ... me too ... so count me in on this vote for wanting to having >> it back ... please ... :-) > I'll fix this for the next release, but I am traveling for the next > few days.... Any chance of making it configurable (default to the old behavior)? I like the new behaviour better, am I the only one? Cheers, Phil -- Phil Jackson http://www.shellarchive.co.uk