From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Bug: org-publish-current-project reverses the force flag. Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 01:14:34 +0000 Message-ID: <8763w97uh1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87ejb0hp37.wl%t60500@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <86C9459A-92CF-4A91-B54C-FD26875B335B@science.uva.nl> <87k5krr7hy.wl%t60500@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> <8E0EE7D9-D622-4F1D-8C90-16F5DF03F196@science.uva.nl> <87lk56neuj.wl%t60500@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUXM9-0004Ow-7N for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:14:41 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JUXM6-0004Mw-PC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:14:39 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JUXM6-0004Mr-KW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:14:38 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.168]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JUXM6-00049c-7H for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:14:38 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so54864ugf.48 for ; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:14:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87lk56neuj.wl%t60500@mail.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp> (Kondo Kenji's message of "Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:45:24 +0900") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Kondo Kenji Cc: Org Mode Mailing List Hi Kondo, Kondo Kenji writes: > Hmm. I tried the git version but timestampes didn't work with C-c C-e P > when `org-publish-use-timestamps-flag' is t. > > Is it OK in your environment? I just tested it and it seems okay. Can you make sure there is no old `org-publish.el' haunting your configuration and then check again? Thanks, -- Bastien