From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Benjamin Andresen Subject: Org-FAQ request for full-text dump Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 02:53:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87632swrjt.fsf@in-ulm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36499 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OCOxp-0003Dx-Hn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2010 23:20:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCMg8-0002xG-LO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2010 20:53:33 -0400 Received: from mail.in-ulm.de ([217.10.8.10]:54256) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OCMg8-0002wq-Bn for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 12 May 2010 20:53:32 -0400 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello guys, quite often people ask question in the IRC-channel (#org-mode on freenode) which are answered in the FAQ. Now I personally find the org-faq very cumbersome to use, due to its javascript-interface that grabs keys. (Just a short thing: I'm faster with my native browser search functionality than with the interface that is used on org-faq.php In my browser it's: /color n n n N n vs. s color s RET s RET s RET and I don't even know how to jump back to a previous search results (also sometimes the first search doesn't even work, I have to do it twice, haven't investigated this further.)) Because of this I currently use the org-faq.org file locally and then grab the CUSTOM_ID and attach it to the org-faq.php link as an anchor. So my question is basically: Could we get a plain dump of the file? (I don't know who controls the export and I guess just copying the file and stripping out all the infoJS stuff is not the right way to do it.) br, benny Please don't take offense, I'm sure many other people like the infoJS interface, I just find it inefficient and mainly different from the way I search the web.