From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tassilo Horn Subject: Re: Fwd: Checkboxes in Agenda Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:42:08 +0200 Message-ID: <876318l9nz.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <6430738E-A5D0-4610-A9F6-4640BE0E5B2C@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44092 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ORobJ-0004lZ-8T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:44:30 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORoZF-0004lv-SO for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:42:19 -0400 Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:37638) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORoZF-0004lb-Lx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:42:17 -0400 Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ORoZE-0002tG-3u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:42:16 +0200 Received: from tsdh.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.67.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:42:16 +0200 Received: from tassilo by tsdh.uni-koblenz.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 17:42:16 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Parker writes: Hi Nick, > Thank you for your reply. Was it intentionally designed to keep > checkboxes out of the agenda view or is it just that way because no > one has submitted a patch to provide that yet? I guess, that's intended. If a checkbox item is such a big task that it deserves its own DEADLINE/SCHEDULED/normal date, then you should have used a TODO heading in the first place. Bye, Tassilo