From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update conflict documentation Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 12:40:50 +0100 Message-ID: <8762tqcrt1.fsf@altern.org> References: <1294773678-45568-1-git-send-email-jrhorn424@gmail.com> <83bp3ml5ts.fsf@yahoo.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38048 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Pe4bM-0003CG-ER for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 06:47:25 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pe4bK-0005Ng-AN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 06:47:23 -0500 Received: from mail-wy0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169]:51711) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Pe4bK-0005Mw-3j for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 06:47:22 -0500 Received: by mail-wy0-f169.google.com with SMTP id 26so3728077wyj.0 for ; Sat, 15 Jan 2011 03:47:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83bp3ml5ts.fsf@yahoo.it> (Giovanni Ridolfi's message of "Wed, 12 Jan 2011 12:27:59 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Giovanni Ridolfi Cc: Jeffrey Horn , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Hi Giovanni, Giovanni Ridolfi writes: > IIRC we have already discussed the right way to refer to our beloved > Unique ;-) GNU/Emacs mode: > > "Org-mode" or "Org mode" ? > > I think Carsten wrote something but, I can't get any reference, sorry :-( > > In the site I thik that it is (almost) always written "Org-mode" or "Org". > > In the info file of my version[1] there are both the two strings. > > So > 1. What is the correct way? I'm not sure there is a correct and a wrong way. I tend to use "Org" when referring to the large set of Org-related features and libraries, and I use "Org-mode" when referring to the core features of the mode itself -- but it's not that easy to determine, and context is important. Let's keep this in mind and fix only the obvious cases (if any!) Thanks, -- Bastien