From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: [bug] new exporter fails on read only files Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:39:26 +0200 Message-ID: <8762ckdi4h.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87k412k6uy.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <8762cmk5ro.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5phia2g.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNrzc-0000LM-8w for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:42:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SNrza-00012i-A5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2012 16:42:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y5phia2g.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric Fraga's message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:52:15 +0930") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Eric Fraga writes: > Actually, I have updated (one minute ago) and the problem has now > changed! I now get this error: > > ,---- > | and: Wrong type argument: stringp, (latex-fragment (:value "\\ref{sec:evaporative}" :begin 11957 :end 11978 :post-blank 0)) > `---- This is a bit short to start investigations. Something is happening at position 11957 in your buffer. You may want to narrow it to the paragraph/table/construct around and try to export it again. It could make a minimal example. You may also try (org-element-parse-buffer) to see if the error comes from the parser or the export engine. You could even try to export to something else, like ASCII, to check if the error comes from the engine itself or from the latex back-end. > and I have no idea what is happening here. For this error, I do get a > debug trace but it is rather long and my org file has material I cannot > post. The last ten lines are usually good enough. > I will try emacs -Q later and will also see if I can come up with a > minimal example that fails in the same way as my longer confidential > document. Since I have no clue for now, I cannot help much. I will look at any data you can provide, though. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou