From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: are super-hidden technical blocks required? Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2012 15:29:49 +0200 Message-ID: <876292pwoi.fsf@gnu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwZ48-0005f3-5x for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 09:34:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwZ42-00041P-E8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 09:34:20 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:42004) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SwZ42-00041A-6Z for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 09:34:14 -0400 Received: by wibhm11 with SMTP id hm11so2981295wib.12 for ; Wed, 01 Aug 2012 06:34:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Torsten Wagner's message of "Tue, 31 Jul 2012 11:48:51 +0900") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Torsten Wagner Cc: Org Mode Mailing List Hi Thorsten, thanks for the detailed example. As I said, I tend to be conversative about such topics. Not because I'm already too old, but because this is often not worth the time-to-implement/complexity-in-code. So I'm still open to read a very compelling case where "tech" properties need to be hidden... Of course, "need" is subjective -- let's say if you manage to have at least 3 friends complaining about tech properties being visible when unfolding a drawer, I'm all ears :) -- Bastien